Structural Engineering, Engagement, and Equity
  • Events
    • 2025 SE3 Symposium >
      • Registration
      • Program Overview
      • Program Deep Dive
      • Travel
      • FAQ
      • Symposium Planning Team
      • Sponsorship
    • Past Events >
      • 2025 Navigating a Career as a Non-US Citizen
      • 2024 Fostering Racial Equity
      • 2024 Parenting Charrette
      • 2024 Celebration of Women in Structural Engineering
      • 2023 Long-Term Mentorship Program
      • 2022 SE3 Symposium Recap >
        • Thought Leaders
        • FAQ
        • Symposium Link Tree
      • 2019 SE3 Symposium Recap
      • 2017 SE3 Symposium Recap
  • Contributors
    • Past SE3 Committee Contributors
  • Publications & Best Practices
    • SEAONC SE3 Publications
    • NCSEA SE3 Publications
    • Monthly DEI Spotlight
    • SE3's Commitment to Racial Justice
  • News
  • Contact Us

In pursuit of greater inclusion

2/24/2020

0 Comments

 
By Hayley Dickson
Diversity, inclusion, equity (our namesake!) are terms that might seem as inescapable (at least to me, as a past SE3 co-chair) in our cultural and political zeitgeist as they are polarizing. There are varying definitions and levels of understanding, and it can be divisive to even bring them up, let alone address any related issues. Why do we care? And if we care, how do we approach such a nuanced and touchy subject? If we can agree on that, what can we as structural engineers even do, in the small subset of the professional world that we occupy? 
​

These are big questions with answers that will undoubtedly change over time as we learn how to live and work better, but we can start with the facts: this does matter. Our 2018 survey revealed that at each ascending position level, we grow less diverse. At the principal level, just 14% of respondents are non-white, and at the entry/staff level this percentage nearly triples. The numbers related to gender show a similar shift, with 16% of principal respondents identifying as female, increasing to nearly half at entry level.  

Though the data shows promise of a diverse future, the picture is not entirely rosy. Those with identities outside the majority are significantly more likely to have experienced discrimination and harassment in the workplace. These are not isolated incidents to be dismissed, with numbers as staggering as 50% of women having experienced discrimination at some point in their careers. It’s meaningful to remember that half of the survey respondents are under the age of 35, so conceivably many of these women are facing discrimination early on in their careers. ​
Picture
SOURCE: "Belonging: A Conversation about Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion"
This diverse group of young engineers are the future of the profession.  But they are also experiencing discrimination and harassment at disproportionately high rates based on identities that differ from an increasingly obsolete norm. Simply put, we have an inclusion problem. Certainly we are not alone, and we can see examples of other industries around us struggling with the same or much worse, as the workforce is growing increasingly diverse across all professions. But the point here is that the data shows that this is an issue for us too, and with that information we can start to address it.

I would like to point out that we, the SE3 Committee, are not experts in implementing company policies to promote inclusivity. And anyone will tell you there’s no one-size-fits-all approach to disrupting bias. I know as engineers we like things to come with a tidy equation, but the thing is, we also know that the world doesn’t actually work like this.  We consistently iterate, improve, and sometimes even completely throw out concepts that we can no longer justify. We constantly strive to have a better understanding of the built environment; the nuances of the interactions. And we’re good at it. As an industry of passionate and thoughtful people, we are poised to solve this problem. So where do we start? Like I said, we don’t have all the answers, but it starts with the individual, and radiates up to firm management.
Here are some tools to get started:
  • Consider your own bias: we are all products of our environment, it’s not something we can control. But we can control our understanding of other people's experience. 
  • Implementing company policies: if you’re a manager, upper management, or even an entry-level engineer (particularly at a smaller company), you can help push for policy change.
  • Involve everyone in the conversation: it’s important that firm decision-makers fully buy in and are part of the conversation. Ensure that members of underrepresented groups feel comfortable speaking up. 
  • Consider overall engagement: it’s engaging to feel included, and if engagement and retention is what we’re after this is important. It’s good business to have engaged employees. 
  • Look for signs of burnout among staff: being able to step in and address problems as they arise is key to retaining staff and improving employee engagement.

Hopefully this is a helpful place to start. See below links to articles with more data and background on what types of initiatives work, why these things are important to address, and how to involve everyone in the process.
  • ​How to Show White Men That Diversity and Inclusion Efforts Need Them
  • Companies are still ignoring older female workers, and it’s hurting their bottom line
  • Recruitment and Retention: AIA Guide for Equitable Practices​​
Photos from the October 2018 workshop Building an Inclusive Workplace for All in the 21st Century.
Hayley Dickson, P.E. is an Engineer at Forell/Elsesser Structural Engineers in the San Francisco Bay Area. Hayley co-chaired the SEAONC SE3 committee for two years, from 2017 to 2019. Over the years, her greatest contributions to SE3 include helping plan  two SE3 symposia (2017 & 2019), and a moderated panel discussion on work-life balance (2018), and follow-up interviews with practicing professionals, retirees and people who left the profession for other careers.
Picture
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    The SEAONC SE3 Committee

    2016-2017

    Archives

    April 2023
    January 2023
    September 2022
    July 2022
    April 2022
    April 2021
    January 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    November 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016

    Categories

    All
    Announcements
    Events
    Resources
    Speaking Engagements

    RSS Feed

  • Events
    • 2025 SE3 Symposium >
      • Registration
      • Program Overview
      • Program Deep Dive
      • Travel
      • FAQ
      • Symposium Planning Team
      • Sponsorship
    • Past Events >
      • 2025 Navigating a Career as a Non-US Citizen
      • 2024 Fostering Racial Equity
      • 2024 Parenting Charrette
      • 2024 Celebration of Women in Structural Engineering
      • 2023 Long-Term Mentorship Program
      • 2022 SE3 Symposium Recap >
        • Thought Leaders
        • FAQ
        • Symposium Link Tree
      • 2019 SE3 Symposium Recap
      • 2017 SE3 Symposium Recap
  • Contributors
    • Past SE3 Committee Contributors
  • Publications & Best Practices
    • SEAONC SE3 Publications
    • NCSEA SE3 Publications
    • Monthly DEI Spotlight
    • SE3's Commitment to Racial Justice
  • News
  • Contact Us